Well this articular has a point, so does the "hairball". when a conflict occurs between two people those people probably wouldn't speak to each other nor their counter parts friend, but now remember that this is a conflict between two people and lets say for instance that me and you are in this conflict should my friend talk to your friend?? that the question i see in this articles. this conflict between the middle east radical groups is larger conflict, evolving nations. The hairball is trying to show that who has more loyalty, and the way to prove that is not accept the enemy's nation people. Is that right, i don't think so because i know not every one is bad but this is classic case of me and you. you are either against me or with me, and if you are with me you do not talk to their friends.
Well this articular has a point, so does the "hairball". when a conflict occurs between two people those people probably wouldn't speak to each other nor their counter parts friend, but now remember that this is a conflict between two people and lets say for instance that me and you are in this conflict should my friend talk to your friend?? that the question i see in this articles. this conflict between the middle east radical groups is larger conflict, evolving nations. The hairball is trying to show that who has more loyalty, and the way to prove that is not accept the enemy's nation people. Is that right, i don't think so because i know not every one is bad but this is classic case of me and you. you are either against me or with me, and if you are with me you do not talk to their friends.
ReplyDelete